Marlin 39A Manufacture Date

This is an area for guests to post questions

Moderators: Regnier (gunrunner), JohnK, Sure-Shot, Marlin

Forum rules
I have unlocked this forum but made it read only for non members -- Webmaster --
Post Reply
FrankD

Marlin 39A Manufacture Date

Post by FrankD »

I have a Marlin 39A with serial number J996L located under the cocking lever. I am 68 years old and the gun is in very good condition and belonged to my grandfather. Can you tell me the manufacture date? Any information will be appreciated. Thanks.
Regnier (gunrunner)
Distinguished Expert
Posts: 4670
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 2:33 am
Location: The Sunflower State

Re: Marlin 39A Manufacture Date

Post by Regnier (gunrunner) »

FrankD;

A Marlin Model 39-A with a "J" prefix serial number would have been manufactured in 1952. There were 32,129 Model 39-A's made that year. This Model 39-A will still have the older, Ballard style rifling instead of the newer, patented Micro-Groove rifling Marlin started using in 1954.
I hope this helps.
Due to the increasing cost of ammunition, there will be no warning shot!

The growing federal deficit = generational slavery to the national debt.

If the world was perfect.......it wouldn't be.
FrankD

Re: Marlin 39A Manufacture Date

Post by FrankD »

A big thank you! I very much appreciate you taking the time to respond.
jam

Re: Marlin 39A Manufacture Date

Post by jam »

i have a marlin 39a serial # B3347 how old is it?
Regnier (gunrunner)
Distinguished Expert
Posts: 4670
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 2:33 am
Location: The Sunflower State

Re: Marlin 39A Manufacture Date

Post by Regnier (gunrunner) »

Jam;

A Marlin Model 39-A with a "B" serial number prefix would have been made in 1940. This will be an early 39-A gun with a case-colored receiver and the old, original Ballard style rifling. A collectors item to be sure........
Due to the increasing cost of ammunition, there will be no warning shot!

The growing federal deficit = generational slavery to the national debt.

If the world was perfect.......it wouldn't be.
Post Reply